

Shift B - create a bookmark, B - View a list of bookmarks.ģ. S1.bmp is from a Turkish epub s2.bmp is from a Turkish mobi displayed with Coolreader3Ģ. It doesn't display images in a book also. On mobi files it displays Turkish characters without any problem. Fonts picked up, picked up a size, padding as necessary, line a distance of 90% - and beauty.Īt the same convert fb2 to pdf, the official software of the Kindle makes it very, well, just very big margins on the edges, so that climbs to the page is much smaller than in CoolReader'e.

#Coolreader kobo pdf#
Personally, for me to finally come CoolReader'om when I no longer feel like all my fb2 bibloteku perekodirvat in PDF with fb2pdf, but I can normally read and fully fb2. In short, CoolReader more friendly to the average user, navigate the interface simpler and clearer, with fb2 copes, and if you plan to read only fb2, then CoolReader can safely recommend to use. It was, perhaps, esdinstvennym neudobstovm transition from FBKindle to CoolReader'a. But brute force is possible to find good fonts, well, or play with contrast and size. Those fonts that look fine on FBKindle, to look weird CoolReader'e and ugly. With these fonts chitalok work is in many ways. CoolReader appears frequently in krakozyabrami mobi files does not seem to picture. Understands the Russian names of files.įBReader reads better mobi (if it's someone important). In less sympathetic CoolReader'a settings (but with the latest updates almost everything you need in them), but much easier to use interface.ĬoolReader has a nice file browser (and it is understandably very, very important if a lot of books uploaded to the device). FBKindle has more options, but to use interface and setup is very easy. That's my opinion (and I enjoyed FBKindle'om with his first days). A question for those who have compared the usability, functionality, and other features glyuchnosti fbridera and kulridera - there's some big difference, or all the differences only cosmetic?
